- 积分
- 3799
- 在线时间
- 7933 小时
- 最后登录
- 2025-6-8
- 阅读权限
- 150
- 精华
- 6
 
- UID
- 11979
- 帖子
- 3951
- 精华
- 6
- 经验
- 3799 点
- 金钱
- 3381 ¥
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-3
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-11-17 11:55
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 aaa168 于 2007-11-17 11:29 发表 
非也:3是黄金膜,4是白金膜,本人喜爱黄金膜的音色,所以只收臧黄金膜的OWIII。
哪个好我还没听过,没有发言权,一开始我是想买两对ow3(一对带磁液一对不带),一对ow4带磁液的,可是后来看了下面这段话就把那对带磁液ow3换成了不带磁液的ow1
"1. Why is the OW1 selected for your speakers, instead of OW1 ferro and OW2/3? "
My response will be somewhat terse.
There are design compromises in ANY driver design. I encourage you to see the Hiquphon page for further information. If you feel ambitius, download the driver parameter calculator (DPC) by Klaus Futtrup. After about 1000 of self-study I was able to spend 10 hours with the DPC. The DPC was quite enlightening.
The OW1 - well damped (i.e. good shock absorbers) and pretty darn fast too.
OW2 - better sensitivity - I don't need that.
OW3 - There is a bunch of stuff happening here, but the orgional intent was a tweeter with a gold dome. Some gent in SE asia paid good $ for quality sound with a gold dome.
Most folks - me included, who have heard the Hiquphon drivers, prefer the OW1.
"2. I think you once said that the power handling of the OW1 is the limiting factor of the loudness capability of the 1801s."
Please do a search for MTM in this forum. I posted some remarks on the subject there. Basically, the driver that surrenders first is depended on the music the 1801 is fed. With heavy female vocals the tweeter does surrender first.
Would the 1801s be able to play louder with the OW1 ferro?
Yep, but the F.R. curve might get a little goofy. I haven't tried this. |
|