原帖由 aaa168 于 2007-11-17 11:29 发表 http://bbs.hifidiy.net/images/common/back.gif
非也：3是黄金膜，4是白金膜，本人喜爱黄金膜的音色，所以只收臧黄金膜的OWIII。:lol
哎呀，上海全新洋喇叭收藏家来了？;P ;P ;P
什么时候还是进一些４吧，还是要多考虑客户的潜在需求。
不好意思，今天加班，先回答大家问题在上图，手机拍的，不大清楚
急死了，快点呀
aaa168你厉害的
原帖由 jingbenfu 于 2007-11-16 21:13 发表 http://bbs.hifidiy.net/images/common/back.gif
还没上图啊,担心楼主大侠被老婆罚跪键盘了.
:'( :'( :'(
嘿嘿，昨天是被老婆小骂了一顿
原帖由 okra 于 2007-11-16 21:16 发表 http://bbs.hifidiy.net/images/common/back.gif
楼主在别的帖子说过是ow４吧。
另外，楼主暴露了同事的工资。
4367 4201……，楼主来自河北;P
完了，暴露了人家的隐私，希望没有认识的，不过我的工资没人家的高
原帖由 明亮 于 2007-11-16 22:01 发表 http://bbs.hifidiy.net/images/common/back.gif
Made in China:lol
如果是made in china我就不用这么麻烦了，这家hiquphon我觉得就是一手工作坊，从经理到车间主任到质检全一人，就是这个奥斯卡先生
一个人做的一致性才好。单体很好做的，哪天我做一堆来给大家看看
原帖由 aaa168 于 2007-11-17 11:29 发表 http://bbs.hifidiy.net/images/common/back.gif
非也：3是黄金膜，4是白金膜，本人喜爱黄金膜的音色，所以只收臧黄金膜的OWIII。:lol
哪个好我还没听过，没有发言权，一开始我是想买两对ow3（一对带磁液一对不带），一对ow4带磁液的，可是后来看了下面这段话就把那对带磁液ow3换成了不带磁液的ow1
"1. Why is the OW1 selected for your speakers, instead of OW1 ferro and OW2/3? "
My response will be somewhat terse.
There are design compromises in ANY driver design.I encourage you to see the Hiquphon page for further information.If you feel ambitius, download the driver parameter calculator (DPC) by Klaus Futtrup.After about 1000 of self-study I was able to spend 10 hours with theDPC.The DPC was quite enlightening.
The OW1 - well damped (i.e. good shock absorbers) and pretty darn fast too.
OW2 - better sensitivity - I don't need that.
OW3 - There is a bunch of stuff happening here, but the orgional intent was a tweeter with a gold dome.Some gent in SE asia paid good $ for quality sound with a gold dome.
Most folks - me included, who have heard the Hiquphon drivers, prefer the OW1.
"2. I think you once said that the power handling of the OW1 is the limiting factor of the loudness capability of the 1801s."
Please do a search for MTM in this forum.I posted some remarks on the subject there.Basically, the driver that surrenders first is depended on the music the 1801 is fed.With heavy female vocals the tweeter does surrender first.
Would the 1801s be able to play louder with the OW1 ferro?
Yep, but the F.R.curve might get a little goofy.I haven't tried this.
http://www.audiocircle.com/circles/index.php?topic=1459.0
上面这段话出自这里，作者叫dave ellis，他的1801音箱就使用的ow1和seas的w18，评价相当好
这段话是他关于这几款高音的评价（那时ow4还没出），大意为：
关于ow3：这里面有很多内幕，但是最初想设计这样一种黄金高音的原因是东南亚的一些绅士愿意花大价钱买黄金膜的高音，但是很多（包括我）听过的人都觉得的ow1比ow3好
怎么上不了图了？
1
1