刚完成FE103的书架箱，发贴庆祝。

liyuan-sh

太晚了，小听了一会，用A5推的，灵敏度很高，开到9点位置就很响了，回味的M1要开到11点才行。声音没有M1甜，但清秀一些，感觉M1就是粗声粗气。低频很差，就好象听耳机的低频，有型无实。总的感觉是没高没低，明天煲下再听。明天再上图片，大家不要错过。

万健

要是跟这个箱比，300元就够了，银笛142-1506X,4-12加配套的分频器，不论低音，高音，动态都远胜。4寸的全频弄个号角箱，只能听听味道罢了。钳版这样说不够全面，只能说某些方面。

大鸟在中国

以下是引用liyuan-sh在2004-12-15 19:43:00的发言：
<img src="attachments/dvbbs/2004-12/20041215194044429.jpg" border="0" onload="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onmouseover="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.style.cursor=\'hand\'; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onclick="if(!this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open(\'attachments/dvbbs/2004-12/20041215194044429.jpg\');}" onmousewheel="return imgzoom(this);" alt="" />
<img src="attachments/dvbbs/2004-12/20041215194148555.jpg" border="0" onload="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onmouseover="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.style.cursor=\'hand\'; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onclick="if(!this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open(\'attachments/dvbbs/2004-12/20041215194148555.jpg\');}" onmousewheel="return imgzoom(this);" alt="" />
燃烧的音箱处定做的箱体，板子软了点，工艺还是满不错的。

这对箱子没有他的样品好看[em12]

小钳子

业余DIY花700元做的多分频箱子超过FE103E的声音不易

虽然103E的低音有点缺陷

万健

但是FE103做倒相箱的话，是对不住它那700元的价值，它只能做号角箱，它的冲程太小，下限也不够。

liyuan-sh

刚完成FE103的书架箱，发贴庆祝。

刚完成FE103的书架箱，发贴庆祝。

燃烧的音箱处定做的箱体，板子软了点，工艺还是满不错的。

liyuan-sh

<img src="attachments/dvbbs/2004-12/200412151937677.jpg" border="0" onload="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onmouseover="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.style.cursor=\'hand\'; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onclick="if(!this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open(\'attachments/dvbbs/2004-12/200412151937677.jpg\');}" onmousewheel="return imgzoom(this);" alt="" />
<img src="attachments/dvbbs/2004-12/20041215193810494.jpg" border="0" onload="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onmouseover="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.style.cursor=\'hand\'; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onclick="if(!this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open(\'attachments/dvbbs/2004-12/20041215193810494.jpg\');}" onmousewheel="return imgzoom(this);" alt="" />

收音机

pxwuestc

我不会喜欢这个箱子，
估计和毒喇叭类似，
既缺高音，又缺低音。
拿来当电脑音箱当然不错。

lm3886

Listening impressions and remarks

I have a love and hate relationship with these speakers. When playing an intimate jazz trio, a Beethoven string quartet or solo vocals you nearly fall off your chair with amazement. Such openness, neutrality and an amazing sound stage with immense depth and width. Every thing can be pin-pointed in the virtual soundscape, every little sound, the turning of a page of sheet music, the breathing of the instrumentalists, its all there. But as soon as it gets a bit heavy (large orchestral works or complex jazz-rock) everything gets muddled up. Here the shortcomings of small cone area, minute Xmax and a single cone trying to produce bass and treble at the same time show. What it also misses is (deep) bass – the addition of a small sub-woofer could help a lot here. When they have support from a rear wall the lower end becomes more in balance with the rest. Of course you can’t expect ultra low bass orgies but the music does have enough body to it. Okay, it doesn’t have the extreme top-end clarity of a good tweeter or the deep bass of a nice large woofer but if you can live with that you will be amazed! For intimate proximity listening of small combo’s, you can’t get much better than this considering how cheap the speaker is.
随便翻译了下（水平有限）：
我对这单元又爱又恨。
当放JAZZ三重唱，贝多芬四重奏或独唱的时候，我吃惊得差点从椅子上掉下来。
如此宽广，中性，惊人的声音拥有极广大的深度和广度。
在虚拟的音乐空间，每样东西都能对应，每样小声音，如翻乐谱声音，演奏家的呼吸声都清晰可闻。
但是，当声音逐渐加重（播放大管弦乐和复杂的JAZZ摇滚）时，每一样都混乱起来。这是小圆锥体的缺点。X-MAX和圆锥体试图同时产生高音和低音，同时也错失超低音，附加个小超低音音箱有较大帮助。
。。。。。。
它不具备好的大型音箱所具备的超高音和重低音，但你将拥有它而感到惊喜。
为了更亲近的聆听小JAZZ乐团再也没比考虑这个这么便宜的箱子好了。

个人感觉：这箱子低音是不大好，不大适合流行音乐，不过听古典小提琴独奏极好。