- 积分
- 2912
- 在线时间
- 1405 小时
- 最后登录
- 2017-12-3
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 精华
- 1
  
- UID
- 1256
- 帖子
- 3540
- 精华
- 1
- 经验
- 2912 点
- 金钱
- 975 ¥
- 注册时间
- 2004-8-19
|

楼主 |
发表于 2005-6-27 12:18
|
显示全部楼层
我还想问问为什么不用SE结构……?
先看SRPP的图(示意用途,参数可能有误):
<img src="attachments/dvbbs/2005-6/2005627121536970.gif" border="0" onload="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onmouseover="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.style.cursor=\'hand\'; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onclick="if(!this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open(\'attachments/dvbbs/2005-6/2005627121536970.gif\');}" onmousewheel="return imgzoom(this);" alt="" />
再看SE(CCS)的图:
<img src="attachments/dvbbs/2005-6/2005627121611694.gif" border="0" onload="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onmouseover="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.style.cursor=\'hand\'; this.alt=\'Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out\';}" onclick="if(!this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open(\'attachments/dvbbs/2005-6/2005627121611694.gif\');}" onmousewheel="return imgzoom(this);" alt="" />
就差这么一点点,但我仿真得SE结构的失真比SRPP更小些……为什么大家都用SRPP而不用SE(CCS)结构呢??
[em12]
|
|