看大家最近玩副丝特的全频的很多
看大家最近玩副丝特的全频的很多，有谁来说说这只单元？不知声底如何？大致意思是：
我对这单元又爱又恨。当放JAZZ三重唱，贝多芬四重奏或独唱的时候，我吃惊得差点从椅子上掉下来。
如此宽广，中性，惊人的声音拥有极广大的深度和广度。
在虚拟的音乐空间，每样东西都能对应，每样小声音，如翻乐谱声音，演奏家的呼吸声都清晰可闻。
但是，当声音逐渐加重（播放大管弦乐和复杂的JAZZ摇滚）时，每一样都混乱起来。这是小圆锥体的缺点。X-MAX和圆锥体试图同时产生高音和低音，同时也错失超低音，附加个小超低音音箱有较大帮助。
。。。。。。
它不具备好的大型音箱所具备的超高音和重低音，但你将拥有它而感到惊喜。
为了更亲近的聆听小JAZZ乐团再也没比考虑这个这么便宜的箱子好了。
以下是一位荷兰人对103倒箱的评价
Listening impressions and remarksI have a love and hate relationship with these speakers. When playing an intimate jazz trio, a Beethoven string quartet or solo vocals you nearly fall off your chair with amazement. Such openness, neutrality and an amazing sound stage with immense depth and width. Every thing can be pin-pointed in the virtual soundscape, every little sound, the turning of a page of sheet music, the breathing of the instrumentalists, its all there. But as soon as it gets a bit heavy (large orchestral works or complex jazz-rock) everything gets muddled up. Here the shortcomings of small cone area, minute Xmax and a single cone trying to produce bass and treble at the same time show. What it also misses is (deep) bass – the addition of a small sub-woofer could help a lot here. When they have support from a rear wall the lower end becomes more in balance with the rest. Of course you can’t expect ultra low bass orgies but the music does have enough body to it. Okay, it doesn’t have the extreme top-end clarity of a good tweeter or the deep bass of a nice large woofer but if you can live with that you will be amazed! For intimate proximity listening of small combo’s, you can’t get much better than this considering how cheap the speaker is.
俺现在是PROAC 1SC
我没玩过，但想都会想到比普通分频箱好很多
这件事的侧面也说明了一件事：我们的分频器设计水平与理想有多大的差距！听过，别的箱子都不要听了。
hehe..一个字
赞~~~~~ 看大家最近玩副丝特的全频的很多 一般的全频声音不咋地，好的全频价格太高，楼主看着办吧…
页:
[1]